Kashif Hafeez Siddiqui

Archive for November, 2010|Monthly archive page

آسیہ کیس کا تجزیہ اور قانون توہئن رسالت

In Blashphemy Law - An Islamic Perspective on November 28, 2010 at 5:34 am

Blasphemy its a product of gross violation of every thing

In Blashphemy Law - An Islamic Perspective on November 27, 2010 at 4:54 pm

By Dr Jawwad Khan

The latest blasphemy case contains awfully shocking events and realities. The persistence with this kinds of incident in all over the world and in Pakistan is unbelieving for many. Once there was a time when no one could ever imagine to commit this felony and remain unpunished in Pakistan. Once  people thought that whoever commit this heinous crime will suffer the consequences. But things are different after 9/11. Although America and west is unable to conquer the ummah through war against terror but they have successful in subjugating the hearts and minds of a sizable faction of ummah through a psychological war, intimidation and temptations. The sequence and global occurrence of this phenomenon(blasphemy) is disturbing for every Muslim who have a intact faith. The whole drama is staged on the principle of “freedom of speech” and “tolerance”. This principle is widely accepted in all over the world. It attracts especially for those third world people who are suppressed and ruled by western sponsored tyrants.The People who never saw or experienced a real freedom especially attracted and seduced by this slogan. The west gave this slogan and west itself made its rules. The rule is that you can not say any thing about the private lives of Tom,Dick and Harry.Personal attack is forbidden and considered as a bad practice but you are allowed to malign and ridicule the honor of exalted and revered Prophets. The main and funny feature of this freedom which should not be neglected is that even though you are not talking on personalities, you are not allowed to talk against the Holocaust. The message is very clear Global Modern Civilization wants you to believe that freedom of speech is much superior to sacredness and glory related with a Prophet-hood.
There is also some internal shocking aspects related with the government and Aasia Bibi. First of all this is not the case of misuse of blasphemy law for personal vendetta. She was charged under 295-C of PPC which clearly says that:

Use of derogatory remarks, etc; in respect of the Holy Prophet. Whoever by words, either spoken or written or by visible representation, or by any imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

We saw highly disgusting behavior of Governor Punjab Malaoon (ملعون) Salman Taseer .One should not forget the Aasia Bibi was a convicted criminal who was trialed and found guilty in court of law. Our “rangeela” governer of Punjab met the Malaoona Aasia Bibi in the jail and asked her to sign a mercy petition with out her prior request. Salman Taseer (ملعون) not only asked her to sign a mercy petition but also called the blasphemy law as a black law in a press conference attended also by malaoona (ملعونہ) Aasia. Nothing in the world like this could ever be seen when a acting high government official  like governor holding a press conference with a convicted criminal and criticizing on the law. This whole process is facilitated by Raaey Wind branded (رائے ونڈ مارکہ) and Jeddah returned “Shareef” government of Punjab. The aim is to make mercy plea be approved and send Aasia (ملعونہ) abroad. Providing a unique opportunity for  the whole world to laugh on us by giving it a impression of:
1) Having impractical laws due to which people are being sent to other countries to avoid injustice.
2) Inconsistencies between constitution and governing bodies.
3) Cowardliness of ruling elite of Islamic republic of Pakistan.

According to information, the investigation officer SP Ameen Shah Bukhari the convicted has been confessed in front of the leaders of the minorities. In the court of law she has been testified by the witnesses for passing derogatory remarks against Nabi e Kareem (peace be upon him) on a quarrel with co-workers. She has been openly investigated, trialed, found guilty of blasphemy and court of law gave a death sentence.

So no one can say that this is a case of misuse of blasphemy law.

But liberals and enlightened moderates giving us the impression that blasphemy law is misused and allegation is false to take revenge from a poor christian woman . This is a typical denial of the reality.

The pope Benedict has a shameful roll on all this recent blasphemy issue . He never protested or raised his voice against Dr.Afia Siddiqi’s case or the case of millions of victims of war against terror. He never showed any sympathies to Muslim victims of Islamo-phobia, for Hijab as a right of Muslim women in Europe. He knows very well that blasphemy is equally forbidden and have the same punishment in Christianity as in Islam. The minority leader who showed the solidarity with the majority of Muslim population of Pakistan turned their back just because they see the world is not in favor of Pakistan and almost all are criticizing against the blasphemy law and started demanding for amendment. This law has already been amended by Pervez Musharraf and every government tries hard to nullify the law. Now launching a F.I.R for blasphemy case is more difficult than ever. One  S.P level police officer is required for this job because now any lower cadre police officer can not register the F.I.R. As soon a F.I.R is launched, accused is taken into police custody primarily to protect him and then investigation is started. As long as law is there and effectively applied there is less chances of misuse of law. People should have a reassurance that justice will prevail and offender will be punished. As long as government do that there is a remote chances that people will take the law in their own hand. In reality this blasphemy law is not only a deterrent but also a shield for innocent minority person. In spite of full support to make it effective, Christian community started believing that they should have a right to say any thing against the most revered and exalted Prophet of Islam. The change in the behavior of Christian community will take them into more troubled and  complicated situation where exaggerated anger will prevail rather than a common sense. Forgetting the fact that Muslim pay more respect to the Prophet Jesus (pbuh) more than any Christian could pay Him as a prophet. No Muslim could possibly think of blasphemy because having faith of his prophet-hood is an essential part of Islamic faith.

Blasphemy law is put in the place to create a deterrent to protect the honor of most revered prophets. Unfortunately this deterrent never worked because successive governments tried hard to avoid international pressure rather than exercising supremacy of law. The ineffectiveness of this law will ultimately make us void from Our glorious history, our struggle with Hindu in Pakistan movement, 2 nation theory, sacrifice of millions of lives to get a homeland where we could practice Islam without fear and pressure. Ignoring the sensitivity and emotional affiliation of Muslims with the Prophet Mohammed(صلی الله علیھ و آل وسلم) and making this law as null and Void though amendment or by not providing force to the law will ultimately results in a wave of shock,anger and frustration with in the Muslims of Pakistan and begets more extremism more hatred and more restlessness. Which i believe is a ultimate goal of world global elite.

The roll of NGOs, liberal jackasses and enlightened moderate is also shocking. The warm and active  support for blasphemer indicate that how deep modern global civilization has been penetrated in our society glitters of Dollar, seducing dreams of life in USA and become the partner of liberal ruling elite of Pakistan.The shocking fact about this ruling elite that great majority always comes from the families of collaborators and traitors. Their forefather served best for British masters and they are serving best for masters (global ruling elite. This whole puppet show is validating the remarks of US official that:

” Pakistanis will sell their mothers for a dollar”.

This remark is true as most of the time our ruling elite offered many exceptional services.
When Aamil Kansi was handed over to US government by Farooq Laghari and Miyan Nawaz Shareef .This remark is true for our ruling traitor elite who not only handed over a Pakistani daughter Dr.Aafia Siddiqi to the savage Americans and later on destroyed her case and let Americans to held her in prison indefinitely. This ferocious ruling elite played the lives of millions of people for the sake of dollars. They used every opportunity to get the dollars. Earth quake, flood, war against terror etc. Their love and hunger for more money is not ambiguous.

This disgusting and traitor ruling elite is put in place to serve their vested interests and serve their masters. If we do a careful analysis we can easily find that world forces do not want a peace and harmony in Pakistan through continuously pressurizing Pakistan to” do more” and keeping under pressure by any and all means. The blasphemy campaign and campaign against the blasphemy law is a part of their tactics. It is a ridiculous to see those who violate the human right more are the biggest champion of human rights and religious rights. Minority community should understand the whole game. They have to live and die in Pakistan. They should not fall in this trap of chaos and bloodshed.

The psychological effect of repeated cases of blasphemy is typical. I remember 10 years ago in a heated discussion with a Indian Hindu,I saw him loosing his patience and started abusing Allah(swt). It was the first time and i was shocked and paralyzed for few minutes and later on i became  so outrageous that if he was present there he would have been killed instantly. The emptiness and rage created due to his comments is unforgettable even after 10 years. But human psyche is not very stable thing. Thing which is once considered as most awful,shocking and unimaginable can become a common practice in compelling circumstances. The same is true for blasphemy. We, the people of Pakistan  are forced to live in compelling conditions it is not far from the fact that we can adopt and can learn to live in shocking incidents like blasphemy. We have already been accommodated many perversions. Rapid and unbelievable changes can be seen taking place in our society. I am not feeling the same anger or height of emotion as i felt 10 years ago. The response of the nation is also weak and slow. Our religious parties did not pay a due attention to this issue.
Did we see any response from religious political parties?
What happened to those who  promote  “Ishq e Rasool(saw)”?
Is common man seems disturbed by blasphemy?

Now comes a big question. What if convicted repents as in case of (ملعونہ)Aasia bibi. The answer according to shariyah and logic is to kill the culprit and close this door once and for all. No doubt that Nabi e Kareem(صلی الله علیھ و آل وسلم) forgave his worst enemies but He (صلی الله علیھ و آل وسلم)always considered ridiculing Himself as a serious crime Therefore blasphemy is always considered as a biggest mischeif. Some time forgave on repentance but in most of the cases he ordered execution to be carried out. Now Nabi e Kareem (صلی الله علیھ و آل وسلم) is no longer with us and ummah is heir of prophet.  It is said that president has a right to pardon the convicted but one should not forget that blasphemy is not like other criminal cases. It is a matter of whole ummah and the sentiments of whole ummah is hurt badly by this act. So president can’t pardon with out the consent of whole ummah.

This is our test case as a nation. We can’t blame the ruling elite all the time. Ball is in our court this time. If we did not force our leaders to act according to the law and if Aasia bibi was sent abroad then i am afraid that we shall loose our emotional affiliation with the Nabi e Kareem(صلی الله علیھ و آل وسلم). Every Muslim man and woman who fears Allah(swt) and worried about the Judgment day should take this event as a warning sign from Allah(swt) and ask this question to ourselves that aren’t we partner in this crime by remaining silent.

Source : http://funadamentalist.wordpress.com/2010/11/26/blasphemy-its-a-product-of-gross-violation-of-every-thing/

سلیم صافی کا کالم

In Blashphemy Law - An Islamic Perspective on November 27, 2010 at 3:33 pm

از شبیر سومرو – ASL ہمارے حکمرانوں کا

In Blashphemy Law - An Islamic Perspective on November 27, 2010 at 3:13 pm

آسیہ بی بی اور قانونﹺ توہینﹺرسالت۔ حامد میر

In Blashphemy Law - An Islamic Perspective, Uncategorized on November 26, 2010 at 6:56 am

Blasphemy-Reason behind aggressive persuasion and islamic perspective

In Blashphemy Law - An Islamic Perspective, Islam - A Study on November 24, 2010 at 12:39 pm

By Dr Jawwad Khan
Once there was a king who suddenly interested in the answers of his 3 questions. He promised a reward for any one who gives the answer. Many people tried but failed. Then a shepherd came forward and answered correctly. One of three question, he asked to the shepherd was about his worth. He asked,” tell me about my worth, while I am sitting on my king’s chair with the crown on my head. The shepherd said,” 29 pennies” The king amazed to learn that and asked,” How could my worth may become so cheap?” The shepherd said,” Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) was sold to Romans for just 30 pennies so your worth can not be the same or more”.

Whenever i observe the level of “tolerance” and “freedom of speech” in the west and their absolute prefrence over the honor of prophet Jesus(pbuh), this story gets refreshed in my mind. In reality west has been sold Its prophet and His honor for less than 30 pennies. They not only practice this kind of “tolerance” and “freedom of speech” but also expect and demand Muslim Ummah to exercise this behavior in a similar way.  As a Muslim we are so intimidated and so pressurized not only by western world but also by their uncountable “enlightened moderate” friends in Pakistan. The current example of stereotype behavior of our govt came when a convicted “maloona” aasia who was sentenced to death on blasphemy charges, called upon our ‘mela’ and ‘rangeela’ governor Punjab equally ‘malaoon’ Salman Tasir, who calls blasphemy law as a black law and forwarded a mercy petition on the behaf of convicted ‘malaoona’ Aasia. Now the news are coming that in spite of court decision she will be pardoned and will be sent abroad.

The blasphemy is supported, conducted and protected by world governments on the name of freedom of speech (but mind it, the freedom of speech is reserved for the blasphemy only do not try it on the issue of Holocaust or you may get in troubles) The purpose is quite clear, to eliminate the emotional affiliation of the Muslims with the Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him). The purpose is to de sensitize the Muslim population on this serious issue. This is a form of psy op, a mental reconditioning through a persuasion i.e. One surrender after another.

50 years ago no one dared to do that because Muslim responded in killing the blasphemer on the spot. We have enlightened examples of Ghazi Alm uddin and others. But now things are different, on the one hand Malaoon Shaitan Rushdi, Tasleema Nasreen, Dr.Wafa Sultan and others are alive, well and protected. Blasphemous cartoons are being republished again and again. Facebook announced a drawing competition. Quran a Kareem is burnt in public places and on the other hand Muslim governments are being persuaded aggressively to protect the people whoever committed this felony. In Pakistan they have successfully nullify the blasphemy law. Many Christians were sent abroad to avoid the death sentence through successive governments. Internally and externally false propaganda has been initiated of persecution of minorities. This job is being carried out vehemently by our civil right organization, bloggers and faction of civil society. Some time i feel that as a society, subliminally we don’t want to pay much attention to this issue.

When I see the whole campaign, i found one purpose which is to make Muslims of Pakistan believe that freedom of speech is much superior to the sacredness, honor and dignity of the most revered Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him). The purpose of the post is to recall the Islamic injunction regarding this sensitive issue and to re sensitize the ummah again.  We need to look again the collection of Ahadith and views of all four school of thoughts and most eminent scholars of Islam on this issue.  


Let us examine again the honor and dignity of a prophet in the lights of Quran e Kareem. Quran says in Sura Alhujrat -verse 2 (49:2)

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لَا تَرْفَعُوا أَصْوَاتَكُمْ فَوْقَ صَوْتِ النَّبِيِّ وَلَا تَجْهَرُوا لَهُ بِالْقَوْلِ كَجَهْرِ بَعْضِكُمْ لِبَعْضٍ أَن تَحْبَطَ أَعْمَالُكُمْ وَأَنتُمْ لَا تَشْعُرُونَ

O you who believe! Raise not your voices above the voice of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم), nor speak aloud to him in talk as you speak aloud to one another, lest your deeds should be rendered fruitless while you perceive not”.

In Sura Al Noor verse 63 (24:63) Quran asks:

لَّا تَجْعَلُوا دُعَاءَ الرَّسُولِ بَيْنَكُمْ كَدُعَاءِ بَعْضِكُم بَعْضًا ۚ

“Make not the calling of the Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) among you as your calling one of another”.

In sura Al Maeda verse 33 (5:33) Quran says:

إِنَّمَا جَزَاءُ الَّذِينَ يُحَارِبُونَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ وَيَسْعَوْنَ فِي الْأَرْضِ فَسَادًا أَن يُقَتَّلُوا أَوْ يُصَلَّبُوا أَوْ تُقَطَّعَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَأَرْجُلُهُم مِّنْ خِلَافٍ أَوْ يُنفَوْا مِنَ الْأَرْضِ ۚ ذَ‌ٰلِكَ لَهُمْ خِزْيٌ فِي الدُّنْيَا ۖ وَلَهُمْ فِي الْآخِرَةِ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ

“The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off from opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter”.

In Sura Al Ahzab verse 57 (33:57) Quran says:

إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يُؤْذُونَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ فِي الدُّنْيَا وَالْآخِرَةِ وَأَعَدَّ لَهُمْ عَذَابًا مُّهِينًا

“Verily, those who annoy Allah and His Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم) Allah has cursed them in this world, and in the Hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating torment”.

In Sura Al Tauba verses 65-66 (9: 65-66), Quran says:

وَلَئِن سَأَلْتَهُمْ لَيَقُولُنَّ إِنَّمَا كُنَّا نَخُوضُ وَنَلْعَبُ ۚ قُلْ أَبِاللَّهِ وَآيَاتِهِ وَرَسُولِهِ كُنتُمْ تَسْتَهْزِئُونَلَا تَعْتَذِرُوا قَدْ كَفَرْتُم بَعْدَ إِيمَانِكُمْ ۚ إِن نَّعْفُ عَن طَائِفَةٍ مِّنكُمْ نُعَذِّبْ طَائِفَةً بِأَنَّهُمْ كَانُوا مُجْرِمِينَ

If you ask them (about this), they declare: “We were only talking idly and joking.” Say: “Was it at Allah (عز وجل), and His Ayat (proofs, evidence, verses, lessons, signs, revelations) and His Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم) that you were mocking?”
Make no excuse; you disbelieved after you had believed. If We pardon some of you, We will punish others amongst you because they were Mujrimun (disbelievers, polytheists, sinners, criminals.)


Let us also look into Sahih Ahadith and see what we can find regarding the sensitivity of this issue.

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: on the day of the conquest of Mecca: There are four persons whom I shall not give protection in the sacred and non-sacred territory. He then named them. There were two singing girls of al-Maqis; one of them was killed and the other escaped and embraced Islam.
(Sunnan Abu Dawud 14:2678)

Narrated Sa’d ibn AbuWaqqas: On the day of the conquest of Mecca, Abdullah ibn Sa’d ibn AbuSarh hid himself with Uthman ibn Affan. He brought him and made him stand before the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him), and said: Accept the allegiance of Abdullah, Apostle of Allah! He raised his head and looked at him three times, refusing him each time, but accepted his allegiance after the third time. Then turning to his companions, he said: Was not there a wise man among you who would stand up to him when he saw that I had withheld my hand from accepting his allegiance, and kill him? They said: We did not know what you had in your heart, Apostle of Allah! Why did you not give us a signal with your eye? He said: It is not advisable for a Prophet to play deceptive tricks with the eyes.
(Sunan abu daud -38 : 4346)

Narrated Abdullah Ibn Abbas: A blind man had a slave-mother who used to abuse the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and disparage him. He forbade her but she did not stop. He rebuked her but she did not give up her habit. One night she began to slander the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and abuse him. So he took a dagger, placed it on her belly, pressed it, and killed her. A child who came between her legs was smeared with the blood that was there. When the morning came, the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) was informed about it. He assembled the people and said: I adjure by Allah the man who has done this action and I adjure him by my right to him that he should stand up. Jumping over the necks of the people and trembling the man stood up. He sat before the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and said: Apostle of Allah! I am her master; she used to abuse you and disparage you. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not abandon her habit. I have two sons like pearls from her, and she was my companion. Last night she began to abuse and disparage you. So I took a dagger, put it on her belly and pressed it till I killed her. Thereupon the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Oh be witness, no retaliation is payable for her blood.
(Sunan abu daud -38 : 4348)

Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib: A Jewess used to abuse the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and disparage him. A man strangled her till she died. The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) declared that no recompense was payable for her blood.
(Sunan abu daud -38 : 4349)

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: Allah’s Apostle said, “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” Thereupon Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” The Prophet said, “Yes,” Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab). “The Prophet said, “You may say it.” Then Muhammad bin Maslama went to Kab and said, “That man (i.e. Muhammad demands Sadaqa (i.e. Zakat) from us, and he has troubled us, and I have come to borrow something from you.” On that, Kab said, “By Allah, you will get tired of him!” Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Now as we have followed him, we do not want to leave him unless and until we see how his end is going to be. Now we want you to lend us a camel load or two of food.” (Some difference between narrators about a camel load or two.) Kab said, “Yes, (I will lend you), but you should mortgage something to me.” Muhammad bin Mas-lama and his companion said, “What do you want?” Ka’b replied, “Mortgage your women to me.” They said, “How can we mortgage our women to you and you are the most handsome of the ‘Arabs?” Ka’b said, “Then mortgage your sons to me.” They said, “How can we mortgage our sons to you? Later they would be abused by the people’s saying that so-and-so has been mortgaged for a camel load of food. That would cause us great disgrace, but we will mortgage our arms to you.” Muhammad bin Maslama and his companion promised Kab that Muhammad would return to him. He came to Kab at night along with Kab’s foster brother, Abu Na’ila. Kab invited them to come into his fort, and then he went down to them. His wife asked him, “Where are you going at this time?” Kab replied, “None but Muhammad bin Maslama and my (foster) brother Abu Na’ila have come.” His wife said, “I hear a voice as if dropping blood is from him, Ka’b said. “They are none but my brother Muhammad bin Maslama and my foster brother Abu Naila. A generous man should respond to a call at night even if invited to be killed.” Muhammad bin Maslama went with two men. (Some narrators mention the men as ‘Abu bin Jabr. Al Harith bin Aus and Abbad bin Bishr). So Muhammad bin Maslama went in together with two men, and sail to them, “When Ka’b comes, I will touch his hair and smell it, and when you see that I have got hold of his head, strip him. I will let you smell his head.” Kab bin Al-Ashraf came down to them wrapped in his clothes, and diffusing perfume. Muhammad bin Maslama said. ” have never smelt a better scent than this. Ka’b replied. “I have got the best ‘Arab women who know how to use the high class of perfume.” Muhammad bin Maslama requested Ka’b “Will you allow me to smell your head?” Ka’b said, “Yes.” Muhammad smelt it and made his companions smell it as well. Then he requested Ka’b again, “Will you let me (smell your head)?” Ka’b said, “Yes.” When Muhammad got a strong hold of him, he said (to his companions), “Get at him!” So they killed him and went to the Prophet and informed him. (Abu Rafi) was killed after Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf.”
(sahih bukhari- 59: 369)
Note: Ka.b bin al Ashraf, was a Jewish leader and he was a very eloquent poet. When the news was carried to Madina of the victory of the Muslims in the battle of Badr and Ka.b ibn al Ashraf heard of that news he said:
If this news is true, then being under the earth is better for us, then being on top of it.. Meaning, it is better for us to die. What good is there in living after the Kuffar of Quraysh have been defeated.And he started making poems in which he would lament the loss of the Mushrikeen and he would also speak against the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and the Muslims.Then he went on to Makkah to present to them his poetry and to also join them in their losses.And he went further and started mentioning Muslim women in his poetry.

Narrated Al-Bara bin azib: Allah’s Apostle sent a group of Ansari men to kill Abu-Rafi. One of them set out and entered their (i.e. the enemies) fort. That man said, “I hid myself in a stable for their animals. They closed the fort gate. Later they lost a donkey of theirs, so they went out in its search. I, too, went out along with them, pretending to look for it. They found the donkey and entered their fort. And I, too, entered along with them. They closed the gate of the fort at night, and kept its keys in a small window where I could see them. When those people slept, I took the keys and opened the gate of the fort and came upon Abu Rafi and said, ‘O Abu Rafi. When he replied me, I proceeded towards the voice and hit him. He shouted and I came out to come back, pretending to be a helper. I said, ‘O Abu Rafi, changing the tone of my voice. He asked me, ‘What do you want; woe to your mother?’ I asked him, ‘What has happened to you?’ He said, ‘I don’t know who came to me and hit me.’ Then I drove my sword into his belly and pushed it forcibly till it touched the bone. Then I came out, filled with puzzlement and went towards a ladder of theirs in order to get down but I fell down and sprained my foot. I came to my companions and said, ‘I will not leave till I hear the wailing of the women.’ So, I did not leave till I heard the women bewailing Abu Rafi, the merchant pf Hijaz. Then I got up, feeling no ailment, (and we proceeded) till we came upon the Prophet and informed him.”
(Sahih Bukhari-Book52, Hadith 264)

Narrated Anas bin Malik: On the day of the Conquest, the Prophet entered Mecca, wearing a helmet on his head. When he took it off, a man came and said, “ibn khatal is clinging to the curtain of the Ka’ba.” The Prophet said, “Kill him.” (Malik a sub-narrator said, “On that day the Prophet was not in a state of Ihram as it appeared to us, and Allah knows better.”
(Sahih Bukhari Book 59, Hadith 582)
Abdullah ibn Khatal had these two slave girls who used to sing against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), they would hold concerts in Makkah singing against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). These two slave girls were on that list along with another slave girl that belonged to Abu Lahab.First of all let.s talk about Abdullah ibn Khatal, he actually was hanging to the cloths of the Ka.bah and one of the companions rushed towards him and killed him!


Imam Abu Hanifa:
“Muslim speaking against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) should be executed and if it is a non-Muslim who doesn.t have a contract he should also be executed.”

Imam Ahmed:
“Whosoever abuses the Prophet (Peace be upon him) our “FINDS HIS FAULTS” then whether he was (previously) Muslim or not, then it is binding to “KILL HIM” and my opinion is that his repentance is not to be accepted rather he is only to be killed”

Imam Malik:
“If someone says that the button of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is dirty, then he should be executed!.Even if it is as small as saying that, then this person should be executed”
“Whether Muslim or Kafir that doesn.t make difference he should be killed without warning!”

Al Waqidi mentions an incident; the Caliph Haroun ar Rasheed asked Imam Malik about a man who had spoken against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). Ar Rasheed told Imam Malik that the Fuqaha. of Iraq gave him a Fatwa to flog this man.Imam Malik was angry and said,
“O Ameer al Mumineen, how can the Ummah survive when its Prophet is cursed! Whoever curses the Prophets should be executed, and whoever curses the companions of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) should be flogged!.

Ibn e taymiyah:
Whoever curses the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) -a Muslim or a non Muslim- then he must be killed!”

“and this is the opinion of the general body of scholar”

“Muhammad bin Sahnun (rah) said: There is consensus (ijma) amongst ulama that anyone who insults the Prophet (Peace be upon him) and finds his defects then such a person is “KAFIR”and there is promise of Allah’s torment upon such a person and in sight of Ummah the ruling regarding him is to “KILL HIM” rather whosoever doubts in Kufr of such a person then he/she commits kufr himself. The research in this matter is that anyone who abuses the Prophet (Peace be upon him) is Kafir and he is to be killed unanimously, this is “MADHAB OF ALL 4 IMAMS” Ishaq bin Rahwiyah and others have mentioned this Ijma. If the abuser happens to be a Dhimmi (non Muslim living in Muslim land) then according to Imam Malik (rah) and people of Madina he is to be killed as well.”

Source : http://funadamentalist.wordpress.com/2010/11/23/blasphemy-reason-behind-aggressive-persuasion-and-islamic-perspective/

Blasphemy law is essential

In Blashphemy Law - An Islamic Perspective, Islam - A Study on November 24, 2010 at 6:43 am

Chancellor, Jamia Islamia, Binnori Town, Karachi

There have been many incidents where people punished the blasphemy accused by themselves. This should never have happened. However, such a situation arises when authorities don’t take a serious view of the most sensitive issue of sacrilege by someone publicly.

Muslims are extremely sensitive about the honour of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and care for it more than their own lives because it is the basis of their faith. Even the Quaid-i-Azam, who was also a great constitutional lawyer, had defended an accused who had killed a blasphemer. However, there are some NGOs which claim to represent human rights, but factually they maintain no contacts with the common people. Their spokespersons have neither been raised nor educated in local conditions.

One such spokesperson has reportedly pledged to take the case of a blasphemer to the higher courts where, according to him, the blasphemy accused are generally released (Dawn July 1, 2002).

The law of the land should be invoked as per the historic perspective, tradition, culture and aspirations of the people. The blasphemy law is very much in accordance with these conditions.

The opponents argue that the blasphemy law is being and prone to be abused. Would somebody point out which law of this country is not being abused and many of them in broad daylight? Should all the laws be abrogated on the basis of this fact?

As far as the freedom of expression is concerned, why is the blasphemy law still on the statute book of even England – mother of all democracies – though the beneficiaries of the law are only adherents to the faith of the ruling class.

Why don’t the exponents of human rights and freedom of speech start their protest campaign in that great democracy instead of an Islamic country?

We need peace and harmony in our beloved country and for this purpose the law of blasphemy is essential

Source: http://www.dawn.com/2002/10/04/letted.htm#2

قانون توھین رسالتؐ

In Blashphemy Law - An Islamic Perspective, Clsh of Civilizations, Pakistan's Ideology on November 24, 2010 at 5:43 am

یہی چراغ جلیں گے تور وشنی ہوگی

In Karachi Karachi on November 23, 2010 at 5:02 am

لا غالب الا اللھ

In I Hate USA, Islam - A Study on November 18, 2010 at 5:55 am